Andre Cronje says most DeFi protocols no longer truly decentralized

Andre Cronje, founder of Flying Tulip and creator of Fantom Network, stated that the majority of today’s decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols are no longer meaningfully decentralized. Speaking during the Chain Reaction X Spaces session, Cronje explained his view that DeFi, in its original form, has largely disappeared except for a few niche projects. Cronje questions decentralization in current DeFi landscape Cronje, a prominent figure in the DeFi sector, emphasized that genuine decentralization requires protocols to be immutable and free from intermediaries. According to Cronje, this definition does not fit the vast majority of current DeFi platforms. He argued that “true DeFi” must offer users complete autonomy and operational transparency without centralized oversight. Cronje observed that most protocols today implement mechanisms such as circuit breakers and emergency controls, measures originally designed to address user safety but which, in his view, introduce centralized elements into the system. DeFi is supposed to be decentralized, immutable, and operate without middlemen, but almost all present-day protocols no longer adhere to these standards, Cronje said. He noted, “I don’t think DeFi exists anymore outside of those very small niches.” Cronje has repeatedly raised these concerns over recent months, highlighting a shift in the sector’s foundational principles. He noted that industry debates increasingly focus on balancing user protection against the ideal of decentralization. Decline in decentralized control and TVL Total value locked (TVL) in DeFi protocols has fallen sharply, with data from DefiLlama showing a decline from $167 billion in October 2025 to $75 billion as of June 2026. The reduction in TVL reflects shifting user confidence and growing concerns about the autonomy of these platforms. DateTotal Value Locked (TVL)October 2025$167 billionJune 2026$75 billionRegulatory authorities have begun to share these doubts. The European Central Bank (ECB), for example, questioned whether decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) can truly operate beyond regulatory reach. In a working paper published in March, the ECB analyzed prominent DeFi platforms—Aave, MakerDAO, Ampleforth, and Uniswap—discovering that more than 80% of governance tokens in each protocol were held by the top 100 holders. The ECB authors argued that these findings cast doubt on whether DAOs are genuinely decentralized. This calls into question their eligibility for exemption under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA), which currently offers certain regulatory leniencies to fully decentralized services. Mini dictionary: MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), a regulatory framework developed by the European Union, aims to harmonize crypto-asset rules across member states and establish regulatory clarity for digital asset operators. Cronje described the evolving landscape as moving toward a model of “onchain finance” or “open finance,” which introduces more oversight but also new opportunities for transparency and innovation. Although the sector has shifted, Cronje recognized that genuine DeFi innovation still occurs within select projects committed to decentralization.